Vatican Radio’s Latin message of John XXIII to the peoples of Africa at the inauguration of a new transmitter is, on its surface, a courteous greeting, congratulating emerging African nations, invoking “joy,” “peace,” and “true liberty,” and clothing the initiative of expanded broadcasts in pious phrases and Pauline citations; yet precisely in its tone, omissions, and political-humanitarian framing it manifests the programmatic shift of the conciliar revolution: the reduction of the Church’s supernatural mission to natural well‑being and de facto benediction of de‑Christianized, Masonic “liberation,” without a single clear call to the only salvific order of the Kingship of Christ and membership in the one true Church.

---

Africa Blessed Without Christ the King: John XXIII’s Humanitarian Rhetoric as Prelude to Apostasy

From Apostolic Mission to Radio-Friendly Sentimentalism

The brief radiophonic text, delivered by antipope John XXIII in 1961 for the extension of Vatican Radio to Africa, must be read in its concrete historical and doctrinal context.

Instead of the perennial voice of the Church, one hears a proto-conciliar, naturalistic tone:

– Africa is addressed predominantly as a geopolitical and cultural bloc, “nations” and “peoples” to be encouraged in prosperity, harmony, and “vera libertas.”
– The content consists almost entirely of:
– compliments on African lands and peoples;
– recollections of diplomatic and social encounters;
– general wishes for family happiness, fecundity, education, civic prosperity, and peace;
– a single decorative Pauline citation, severed from its doctrinal context, to varnish a message that otherwise studiously avoids the hard edges of Catholic dogma.

Nowhere in this message does John XXIII:
– proclaim that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation;
– assert the obligation of all men and nations to submit to the social Kingship of Christ;
– warn against paganism, Islam, Protestant sects, Freemasonic nationalism, socialism, or syncretism;
– summon rulers to recognize the rights of the true Church;
– mention the necessity of supernatural faith, the state of grace, the Most Holy Sacrifice, confession, or the last ends: death, judgment, heaven, and hell.

This silence is not accidental; it is programmatic. It is the practical abrogation of the integral magisterium of the pre-1958 Church in favor of a horizontal “benevolence” that Pius XI and Pius IX explicitly condemned when divorced from the recognition of Christ’s reign.

Factual and Historical Level: The Blessing of Masonic “Liberation” Without the Gospel

In 1961, the so‑called decolonization of Africa was being driven by ideologies and networks repeatedly unmasked by the pre-conciliar magisterium: laicism, socialism, pan-nationalism shaped by Freemasonry and anti-Catholic forces. Pius IX in the Syllabus Errorum condemned the notion that:
– states originate all rights (prop. 39),
– the Church must be separated from the state (prop. 55),
– “progress” and “modern civilization” can be reconciled with liberalism (prop. 80).

Pius XI, in Quas primas, taught with crystalline clarity that peace and authentic liberty are impossible unless individuals and states publicly recognize the reign of Christ and submit laws, education, and social life to His dominion.

Against this doctrinal backdrop, John XXIII’s radiophonic message is devastatingly revealing.

Key factual observations:

1. The entire initiative is framed as an expansion of media infrastructure:
– “Radiophonica Vaticana Statio, novis susceptis incrementis, frequentiores nuntios Africanis populis mittendos curabit.”
– No reference is made to using this instrument for doctrinal militancy against paganism, Islam, schism, heresy, or secularism; instead, it is self-congratulatory technophilia harmonized with diplomatic goodwill.

2. Africa is praised for its “great hope,” “beauty,” and “peoples,” but there is:
– no insistence that this hope is fulfilled only in incorporation into the one visible Catholic Church;
– no restatement of the duty of African nations to reject false cults and to submit to the one true religion.

3. The wishes enumerated:
– “felicity” of families and nations;
– “honourable” marriages adorned with mutual love and fecundity;
– virtuous youth with strong bodies and noble souls;
– all social orders fostering prosperity and peace;
– “vera libertas”
are expressed without doctrinal determination of their foundation in Christ’s law and the authority of His Church. This is a practical endorsement of a natural order abstracted from the supernatural order.

From the perspective of the authentic magisterium, such silence in an official message is not pastoral delicacy; it is dereliction. The Church has a divine mandate to teach all nations, baptizing them and commanding them to observe all that Christ taught (cf. Matt 28:18–20). Pius XI explicitly grounds peace in the social subjection of peoples and rulers to Christ the King. To speak of “peace,” “prosperity,” and “liberty” without this subjection is to teach implicitly the condemned liberal thesis that public order can be just and blessed without the confession of the true religion.

Linguistic Level: Soft Humanitarianism as the Idiom of the Conciliar Sect

The rhetoric of this message exemplifies the linguistic shift that heralded the conciliar sect:

– The tone is sentimental, diplomatic, and affective, brimming with “benevolentia,” “gaudium,” “laetitia,” “caritas,” yet void of militant doctrinal clarity.
– Africa is called “dilecti filii,” but in a way emptied of the traditional corollaries: the fatherhood of the Roman Pontiff as supreme teacher and ruler of the one flock, the obligation to renounce false worship, and the sword of canonical discipline.
– The choice of expressions:
– “vera libertas” is gravely ambiguous; detached from explicit submission to Christ’s law, it echoes the very liberal slogans condemned in the Syllabus. Real Catholic liberty is the faculty to do the good according to divine law, not the self-determination of nations outside the Kingship of Christ.
– “prosperitas,” “felicitas,” “peace” are invoked in the vaguest political-humanitarian fashion, indistinguishable from speeches of secular statesmen.

Note the calculated deployment of Scripture:

– John XXIII quotes Philippians:

“Fratres mei carissimi et desideratissimi — gaudium meum et corona mea, sic state in Domino, carissimi … et pax Dei, quae exsuperat omnem sensum, custodiat corda vestra et intellegentias vestras in Christo Iesu.”

Yet he does not explain what it means “to stand in the Lord”: adherence to the Catholic faith, rejection of heresy and paganism, obedience to the Church’s magisterium, life in the state of grace. The apostolic admonition is reduced to a decorative closure, a biblical perfume sprinkled over a naturalistic address.

This is linguistic Modernism: retaining isolated Catholic terms, emptied of their dogmatic content and inserted into a new humanitarian narrative.

Theological Level: Systematic Omission as Denial of the Supernatural Order

Quod tacite fit, consentire videtur (he who remains silent is taken to consent). In magisterial and pastoral acts, strategic silence concerning dogmas where they must be affirmed is tantamount to practical negation.

Measured against pre-1958 Catholic doctrine:

1. Silence on the Necessity of the Catholic Church

There is no mention that:
– the Catholic Church is the one ark of salvation;
– reception of baptism and adherence to the integral faith are necessary for salvation;
– false religions and syncretistic cults prevalent in Africa are works of darkness to be rejected.

This contradicts the duty reiterated by Pius IX, Leo XIII, Pius X, and Pius XI to proclaim unambiguously the exclusive truth of the Catholic faith. To praise “peoples” and “nations” without distinguishing between those in the Church and those in error is to suggest salvific value in religious pluralism — a practical indifferentism.

2. Silence on the Social Kingship of Christ

Despite wishing “peace” and “true liberty,” John XXIII never:
– calls African rulers to recognize Christ as King;
– demands that laws, education, and public life conform to divine and ecclesiastical law;
– condemns secularism, Masonic nationalism, or the separation of Church and state.

Pius XI in Quas primas explicitly teaches:
– Peace will not shine upon nations until they recognize the reign of Christ.
– States and rulers sin gravely when they exclude Christ and His Church from law and governance.
Pius IX condemns the separation thesis as an error (prop. 55, Syllabus).

By omitting these principles precisely while inaugurating a propaganda instrument directed at newly “independent” nations shaped by liberal constitutions, John XXIII tacitly legitimizes an order divorced from Christ’s Kingship. This is not continuity; it is revolt.

3. Silence on Sin, Grace, Sacrifice, and Judgment

The message:
– does not mention original sin or the need for redemption;
– does not mention the Most Holy Sacrifice, confession, or sanctifying grace;
– does not warn about hell, error, or the devil;
– offers no call to conversion, penance, or doctrinal adherence.

Instead, it proposes:
– flourishing families,
– moral youth,
– social cooperation,
– civic prosperity
as if these were autonomously attainable merely by human effort and a vague invocation of divine “blessing.”

This is practical Pelagianism and naturalism, condemned by the Church. It is likewise in radical conflict with Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi, which anathematize the reduction of Christianity to a religious feeling or moral uplift severed from objective dogma and sacramental life.

4. Instrumentalization of the Church’s Voice

The message celebrates the technical strengthening of Vatican Radio as a means of “more frequent messages” for African peoples. Under the true magisterium, such an expansion would be an occasion to:
– intensify catechesis in the integral faith;
– combat errors, superstition, and sects;
– proclaim the Kingship of Christ and the rights of the Church.

Here it appears as an instrument of soft diplomacy and international prestige. The Church’s voice is retooled as a “service” to nations rather than the authoritative, supernatural proclamation of divine truth with binding force on consciences and states.

This is congruent with the condemned proposition (Lamentabili 4, 7) that denies the Church’s right to determine the sense of Scripture and require internal assent, and with the liberal ideology that reduces her to a moral influence among many.

Symptomatic Level: Prototype of the Conciliar Humanitarian Gospel

This 1961 message is not an isolated courtesy; it is a symptom and precursor of the entire conciliar sect’s new religion:

1. Anthropocentric Focus

– Man, peoples, nations, development, prosperity, “true liberty,” dialogue, and sympathy: these dominate.
– Christ the King, dogma, the condemnation of errors, the necessity of the Church: absent.

This anticipates the cult of man later solemnized by the conciliar usurpers: the Church of the New Advent existing to accompany and legitimize human aspirations, not to subdue them to Christ.

2. Ecumenical and Religious-Indifferentist Atmosphere

– Africa, religiously plural and heavily non-Catholic, is addressed without any distinction between those in the truth and those in darkness.
– The message anathemizes neither Islam nor tribal cults nor Protestantism; they disappear into the generalized category of “Africae populi,” all embraced with the same benevolent formulae.

This is the practical denial of proposition 21 of the Syllabus (that the Church can define herself as sole true religion) and of the axiom that outside the Church there is no salvation understood in its integral, pre-conciliar sense.

3. Subtle Redefinition of “Peace” and “Liberty”

Peace is spoken of as psychological and political serenity; liberty as a vague national and social good.

– Pius XI: true peace and liberty are fruits of the public recognition of Christ’s sovereignty.
– Pius IX: freedom of cults and separation are condemned as sources of indifferentism and moral ruin.

John XXIII’s message never clarifies that “vera libertas” is obedience to divine law; in the concrete historical situation, his vocabulary aligns seamlessly with liberal, Masonic narratives of national self-determination, now perfumed by ecclesiastical approval. This is not accidental; it serves the ecumenical, laicist project that would be dogmatized by the conciliar usurpers.

4. From Mission to Dialogue

The spirit is no longer apostolic conquest of souls and nations for Christ; it is sympathetic dialogue with peoples as they are.

– No call to abandon pagan practices.
– No insistence that civil laws must conform to the moral law.
– No missionary urgency.

The Church of the martyrs sent men to die rather than allow one soul to remain in idolatry. The paramasonic neo-church sends radio waves of sentimental good wishes, legitimizing idolatrous nations so long as they fit the new humanitarian liturgy.

The Gravity of Omission: When a “Blessing” Becomes a Betrayal

One might argue: “It is only a brief message; doctrine is presupposed.” This defense collapses before the teaching and example of the pre-1958 papacy.

– Pius XI, precisely in public addresses to nations, relentlessly recalled their duty to Christ the King.
– Pius IX, Leo XIII, and Pius X never wasted public interventions on sterile sentiment; they bound consciences, denounced errors, and asserted the rights of the Church.
– The Church has always known that diplomatic occasions are prime moments for supernatural witness, not for muting of doctrine.

When, in such contexts, the explicitly supernatural note is systematically suppressed, one does not “presuppose” doctrine; one replaces it. The omission is itself catechesis—that man, nations, and cultures may be blessed in their own terms, with “peace” and “liberty,” without explicit conversion to the Catholic order.

This is the heart of the conciliar antichurch: a counterfeit “charity” that refuses to tell nations the truth about their obligations to God. Such a message, broadcast as the official voice of the structures occupying the Vatican, is not a harmless courtesy; it is a public scandal which:
– encourages nations to conceive their future without acknowledging Christ’s social Kingship;
– confirms them in religious indifferentism;
– trains Catholics to think in horizontal, naturalistic categories.

Pius XI, Quas primas, affirms that peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ and that excluding Him from law and education destroys the foundations of authority. John XXIII’s text speaks of peace and national prosperity without once demanding Christ’s public rights. The contradiction is irreconcilable. One must choose.

Conclusion: A Programmatic Fragment of the New Naturalistic Religion

This radiophonic “message” is a small but pure specimen of the new orientation:

– The Holy Office under Pius X condemned as Modernist the notion that dogma may be silently bracketed in pastoral practice while replaced by a religiously neutral, historically adaptive discourse centered on human progress and fraternity.
– Pius IX exposed the paramasonic sects that seek to subject the Church to liberal states and to neutralize her doctrinal militancy through vague humanitarianism.
– Pius XI raised the feast of Christ the King precisely against the laicist state and the secular cult of nations.

In this light, John XXIII’s address:
– exalts peoples and nations in their natural aspirations;
– blesses “true liberty” without defining it as obedience to Christ;
– invokes “peace” without preaching the social Kingship of Christ;
– employs pious language to cover a fundamentally naturalistic, diplomatic gesture.

It is therefore not a Catholic papal message in continuity with the pre-1958 magisterium, but a text consistent with the conciliar sect’s program: to baptize the world’s revolution with ecclesiastical sentiment while silencing the exclusive claims of Christ and His Church.

Lex orandi, lex credendi (the law of prayer is the law of belief). When even “pontifical” messages cease to confess the integral faith and instead speak the language of man-centered progress, they reveal the faith of their author and of the structure he heads. The radiophonic word here exposed is not the apostolic voice of Peter, but the smooth tongue of a new, humanitarian religion preparing the way for the full manifestation of the abomination of desolation in the holy place.

---

Source:
Nuntius Radiophonicus Africae populis, radiophonica Vaticana statione novum inaugurante instrumentum ad aetherias eliciendas undas, quibus diurnorum actorum communicationes Africanis darentur gentibus…   (vatican.va)
Date: 11.11.2025