The radiophonic message of 27 April 1959 presents John XXIII calling the bishops and faithful of the whole world to intensified Marian prayers during the month of May for the success of the announced “ecumenical council.” He extols Mary’s maternal mediation, recalls her presence in the Cenacle before Pentecost, and urges clergy, religious, the sick, families, and children to unite in supplication so that, through her intercession, a “new Pentecost” may smile upon the Christian family and ensure a “happy outcome” of the council he intends to convoke. This apparently devout exhortation is, in reality, the pious-smelling curtain behind which the greatest subversion of the visible structures of the Church was prepared, disfiguring Marian piety into a spiritual fuel for the conciliar revolution.

---

John XXIII’s Marian Exhortation as Preludium to Conciliar Subversion

Factual Inversion: Marian Devotion Instrumentalized to Legitimize a Revolutionary Assembly

The text opens by claiming that in this age Mary is “more present” and urgently calling to penance and virtue, while “nefarious plagues” increase. John XXIII then links this directly to his project:

“Therefore…the Christian people…at this time should strive to obtain from the Mother of God the happy outcome of a cause which is assuredly of the greatest importance and weight. For, as We have already publicly announced, We have decided to convene an Ecumenical Council…”

The structure is clear:

– First: Recognize Mary’s power of intercession.
– Second: Invoke historical Catholic language (Cenacle, Pentecost).
– Third: Channel all this supernatural capital toward one concrete goal: support for his “ecumenical council.”

On the factual level, several things must be underscored:

1. The text never even hints that the announced council is bound, in se, to reaffirm and defend the already defined, immutable doctrine against modern errors. There is no explicit pledge of doctrinal intransigence against Liberalism, Naturalism, Religious Indifferentism, Masonry, and Modernism condemned by Gregory XVI, Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Benedict XV, and Pius XI.
2. There is no reference to the concrete, named enemies of God and His Church so lucidly unmasked in the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX, in the anti-liberal encyclicals, or in Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi of St. Pius X, where Modernism is branded as the synthesis of all heresies.
3. The urgent, precise condemnations of the pre-1958 Magisterium are replaced here by a vague rhetoric about “nefarious plagues” and “dangers,” without doctrinal identification of the poison—an omission that, in this context and moment of history, is itself an indictment.

Instead of making the faithful beg that any future council courageously anathematize the errors explicitly condemned by Pius IX and St. Pius X, John XXIII asks them to pray for the “happy outcome” of a project whose content he leaves undefined while we know, from history, that it would open the floodgates to the very errors those pontiffs had branded as mortal.

This is not innocuous: it is the instrumentalization of genuine Marian piety to bind consciences emotionally to an as-yet unformulated but already ideologically oriented “council” that would be exploited to introduce the very principles condemned in the Syllabus (religious freedom, separation of Church and State, glorification of modern civilization) and in Lamentabili and Pascendi (evolution of dogma, historicism, doctrinal relativism).

Lex Orandi Twisted: From Christ the King to a “New Pentecost” of the World

John XXIII encourages a “quasi concert of prayers” so that:

“…all…before the altars of the Mother of God, who is rightly called the Spouse of the Paraclete, may implore the gifts of the same Holy Spirit, so that a new kind of Pentecost may smile upon the Christian family.”

Two essential manipulations emerge:

– The legitimate Catholic sense of Pentecost—as the definitive founding of the Church, endowed with an immutable deposit of faith and a divinely instituted hierarchical constitution—is subtly re-coded into “a new kind of Pentecost,” opening the door to the idea of a renewed Church, adaptable to “the world” and its expectations. This sails dangerously close to the condemned Modernist thesis that revelation and doctrine evolve with historical consciousness (*Lamentabili*, prop. 58, 59; *Pascendi* throughout).
– The prayer is not that the Holy Spirit confirm and strengthen the Church against the “errors of our times” already identified (Naturalism, Rationalism, Liberalism, Socialism, Masonic sects) but that He ratify an event architected by men whose program—diplomacy with Communism, “opening to the world,” and the cult of human dignity detached from Christ the King—was already manifest in their orientations.

Pius XI, in *Quas primas*, teaches that there can be no true peace nor social order unless states and societies submit publicly and juridically to the reign of Christ the King; he denounces the secularist apostasy that removes Christ from public life and affirms that such defection is the root of modern disasters. John XXIII, instead of invoking the council to restore *this* social kingship in all its rigour, speaks only of a “new Pentecost” for the “Christian family,” a deliberately softer and familial horizon, compatible with the later conciliar cult of dialogue, liberty of religions, and dignitarian humanism.

By divorcing the appeal to the Holy Ghost from the explicit demand for the triumph of the social kingship of Christ and from clear condemnation of liberal modernity, he inaugurates the liturgical-ideological formula that would be used to impose the conciliar agenda: pious phrases as anesthesia for doctrinal mutilation.

Linguistic Cloaking: Sweetness without Dogma as a Symptom of the Modernist Mind

The rhetoric of the message is revealing. Key traits:

– Overabundance of sentimental language: “Augusta Dei Parens,” “clementissima deprecatrix,” “Matrem habemus,” “amantissimam Matrem,” “miserentissima Regina.” In themselves legitimate, these expressions are here deployed as a thick sugar coat that hides the absence of sharp dogmatic content.
– Vague references to “nefariae pestes” and “salutis discrimen,” without doctrinal identification: no mention of Socialism, Communism, Freemasonry, Naturalism, Indifferentism, or Modernism—precisely those enemies denounced by the pre-1958 Magisterium as the organized “synagogue of Satan” undermining Church and society (cf. Pius IX against secret societies in the appended passages; St. Pius X against Modernism as the synthesis of all heresies).
– Absence of the language of combat, militancy, anathema, and hierarchical authority so present in Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII. Instead, we hear of a “happy outcome,” “felicem exitum,” “nova quaedam Pentecoste,” all carefully emptied of juridical and dogmatic precision.

This style is not a neutral aesthetic choice. It corresponds exactly to what St. Pius X unmasked as the Modernist tactic: avoid categorical formulations and anathemas, adopt an irenic, evolutionary, pastoral rhetoric, so that the faith be gradually transformed from within under the pretext of “updating” and “renewal.”

Lex orandi, lex credendi (“the law of prayer is the law of belief”): when Marian devotion is systematically detached from explicit confession of Christ’s social reign and from militant opposition to heresy, it ceases to be a bulwark and becomes a pliable instrument for whatever new theology the handlers wish to introduce.

Theological Dislocation: Marian Language without Marian Orthodoxy

On the surface, the message affirms true Catholic principles:

– Mary as intercessor who powerfully obtains graces.
– Mary present with the Apostles, persevering in prayer before Pentecost (Acts 1:14).
– Mary’s unique bond with the Church.
– Encouragement of the Holy Rosary, novenas, family prayer, and offering of suffering.

Yet the entire supernatural arsenal is misdirected.

1. The council to which the faithful are ordered to attach their Marian supplications is not framed as a defensive bastion of the already defined deposit of faith, but as an open process, whose content is left in deliberate vagueness and optimism, precisely in a context where Modernist and liberal forces were pressing for doctrinal concessions.
2. There is no reaffirmation that any valid council is strictly bound by the previous definitions and condemnations, that it cannot recognize the “rights” of error or embrace the “liberty” of false cults, already condemned as pernicious (Syllabus, props. 15–18, 77–80). Silence here is not harmless; it is the quiet removal of the doctrinal guardrails.
3. The Marian piety proposed is purely affective, detached from her role as terror of heresies and destroyer of all heresies in the whole world, and from her intimate link with the integrity of dogma. The text never presents Our Lady as the victorious Queen who crushes all false religions, eradicates indifferentism, and obtains grace for the conversion— not co-existence—of nations.

By omitting these dimensions, the message subtly shifts Marian devotion toward an irenic and ambiguous spirituality, easily integrated into the later conciliar ecumenical and interreligious program that treats error as dialogue-partner instead of mortal poison.

Systemic Symptom: From Pre-Conciliar Condemnations to Conciliar Capitulation

This radiophonic exhortation must be read as a symptom and a strategic step in a broader process.

Before 1958:

– Pius IX’s Syllabus stigmatizes as condemned:
– The claim that man may embrace any religion by reason alone (prop. 15).
– That salvation can be found in any religion (prop. 16).
– That Protestantism is merely another form of true Christianity (prop. 18).
– That the Church must be separated from the State (prop. 55).
– That the Roman Pontiff must reconcile himself with Liberalism and modern civilization (prop. 80).
– St. Pius X in *Lamentabili* and *Pascendi* exposes and anathematizes:
– The evolution of dogma.
– Reduction of revelation to religious experience.
– Historical relativizing of dogmatic formulas.
– Denial of the Church’s right to judge doctrine and science.
– Pius XI in *Quas primas* defines as grave error:
– The exclusion of Christ and His law from public life.
– The religious indifference of the State.
– The laicist separation claiming neutrality of public authority.

All these teachings demand from any true Successor of Peter and from any authentic council an unambiguous stance: reaffirmation of exclusive truth, condemnation of liberal and ecumenical apostasy, insistence on the public kingship of Christ.

John XXIII’s message, however:

– Avoids naming religious liberty, ecumenism, separation of Church and State, or Modernism as enemies to be crushed.
– Asks prayers not that the council defend defined truth against these errors, but generically that it have a “happy outcome,” cloaked in sentimental Marian-Charismatic imagery (“new Pentecost”).
– Uses the emotional prestige of Marian devotion to disarm legitimate Catholic vigilance and induce in the faithful a priori trust in an event not yet held but already ideologically directed.

This is precisely how a “conciliar sect” is midwifed: exploit symbols of Tradition while emptying them from within, so that, when the doctrinal inversion is promulgated (religious liberty, false ecumenism, cult of man), the faithful, having been conditioned to associate the project with Mary, will hesitate to resist.

God’s Rights Buried under Emotional Piety

Most serious is the almost total absence in this message of the theme which Pius XI and the whole pre-1958 Magisterium held as central: *the objective, sovereign rights of God and of Christ the King over individuals, families, and nations.*

Instead we find:

– Appeals to Marian tenderness.
– Appeals to a “Christian family.”
– Generic invocation of the Holy Spirit.
– An invitation that all categories (bishops, clergy, religious, sick, children) offer prayers and sacrifices.

What is missing is decisive:

– No exhortation that civil rulers and peoples submit to the reign of Christ, condemned if they legislate against His law.
– No insistence that any council must combat the satanic program of Freemasonry that seeks to separate Church and State, neutralize Catholic influence, and exalt the “rights of man” against the rights of God—as Pius IX describes when unmasking the sects which, under the disguise of progress and mutual benefit, wage war on the Church.
– No reminder that Marian intercession is ordered to the triumph of her Son’s kingship and the crushing of all heresy, not to the blessing of ambiguous projects that will later enthrone the religion of human dignity, universal fraternity without conversion, and the cult of man so ostentatiously proclaimed by the conciliar structures.

This silence is not accidental. It is the theological signature of a mentality that has already interiorly capitulated to the modern world and seeks a religious vocabulary compatible with it. Marian devotion becomes a decorative veil for the reconciliation with “modern civilization” solemnly condemned by Pius IX.

Perverse Pastoralism: The Faithful Mobilized without Truth

The message methodically mobilizes:

– Bishops: entrusted to lead their flocks in these supplications.
– Clergy: singled out as particularly loved by Mary.
– Religious: cloistered souls urged to intensive prayer.
– Families: called to pray at home if they cannot go to church.
– The sick: invited to offer sufferings as sacrifice.
– Children: their innocence invoked as especially pleasing to the Virgin.

All of this is objectively good when ordered to the defense and triumph of integral Catholic faith. But here it is exploited to generate a mass spiritual consent to a future council whose program will, in fact, strike at that same integral faith.

This pastoral style—mobilizing affect, sacrifice, and good will, while withholding doctrinal clarity—is the exact inversion of Catholic governance. The Church of Christ must teach first, so that prayer and obedience are enlightened and ordered to truth. Here, under John XXIII, the structures occupying the Vatican seek blind emotional adhesion, which will later be claimed as tacit consent to their conciliar novelties.

Ignorantia non est mater devotionis (“ignorance is not the mother of devotion”): authentic Marian piety does not ask the faithful to endorse undefined projects, but to cling ever more tightly to defined doctrine and to reject any novelty that conflicts with it.

Continuity of the Pre-Conciliar Magisterium versus the Conciliar “New Pentecost” Myth

Confronting this message with the binding pre-1958 teaching reveals an irreconcilable fault line:

– Pius IX: condemns religious indifferentism, exalts the exclusive truth and rights of the Catholic Church, unmasks the Masonic plan to dethrone Christ.
– Leo XIII: recalls that all authority is from God, denounces the secular State as a rebellion against divine order, warns against the pretended neutrality of public institutions.
– St. Pius X: commands the eradication of Modernism, insists on fixed dogma, stable rites, and the duty of the Magisterium to condemn error without compromise.
– Pius XI (*Quas primas*): proclaims that peace and social order exist only under the public reign of Christ, condemns the outlawing of His law from public life, sees laicism as apostasy.
– Pius XII: though often more reserved, still presupposes the same doctrinal framework, never affirming a right to false cults nor abandoning the exclusive claims of the Church.

John XXIII’s radiophonic message, viewed in this light:

– Retains a shell of Marian language.
– Dilutes doctrinal clarity into pastoral generalities.
– Prepares consciences for a “new Pentecost” that in practice will mean:
– A council that refuses to condemn Communism explicitly.
– Approval of religious liberty incompatible with the Syllabus.
– Ecumenism that treats false religions and sects as partners instead of errors to be converted.
– Reform of the liturgy deforming the Most Holy Sacrifice into an assembly meal.
– Replacement of Christocentric social order with anthropocentric humanitarianism.

To present such a council as the object of Marian intercession is to conscript the Mother of God as symbolic patroness of a paradigmatic rebellion against her Son’s sovereign rights and against the defined Magisterium. This constitutes a spiritual perversion: what Pius IX and St. Pius X identified as the program of the enemies of the Church is now wrapped in Marian piety to make it palatable.

Conclusion: Marian Piety Weaponized against the Deposit of Faith

John XXIII’s 27 April 1959 message is not a simple, innocent Marian exhortation. It is:

– A calculated use of authentic devotions (May, Rosary, novenas, offering of suffering) to forge emotional adhesion to a coming “ecumenical council” whose nature and direction are left opaque but whose historical outcome we know: doctrinal, liturgical, and disciplinary devastation.
– A linguistic and theological shift from militant defense of the deposit of faith and of Christ’s kingship to sentimental, undefined “renewal” imagery—*nova quaedam Pentecoste*—which correlates perfectly with the Modernist agenda condemned by the pre-1958 Magisterium.
– A symptomatic document of the emerging “Church of the New Advent,” in which even Mary is invoked not as destroyer of all heresies, but as a gentle sponsor of “opening to the world,” dialogue, and structural apostasy.

Measured against the unchanging doctrine reaffirmed by Pius IX, St. Pius X, and Pius XI, this message stands exposed as the spiritual preface to the conciliar betrayal: it clothes the coming revolution in Marian language, so that the faithful might lower their guard and mistake the voice of novelty for the voice of Tradition. Such a manipulation of Marian devotion is not merely imprudent; it is a grave abuse of what is holiest in Catholic piety, ordered not to the triumph of Christ the King, but to the consolidation of the conciliar sect that has since occupied the visible structures once Catholic.

---

Source:
Quo Locorum Ordinarii et Universi Orbis Christifideles adhortantur ad impensas supplicationes habendas, per maium mensem, Ob Oecumenicum cogendum Concilium, Die 27 Aprilis 1959, Ioannes PP. XXIII   (vatican.va)
Date: 11.11.2025