Grata recordatio is presented as an encyclical of John XXIII, dated September 26, 1959, exhorting the episcopate and faithful to the devout recitation of the Marian Rosary (especially in October), recalling Leo XIII’s Rosary encyclicals, evoking the memory of Pius XII, underlining the alleged continuity of the Roman Pontificate, insisting on prayer for peace and for political leaders, condemning in generic terms “laicism” and “materialism,” and finally asking for prayers for the “Roman Synod” and the forthcoming “Ecumenical Council,” portrayed as instruments for the spiritual renewal of the Church and peace among nations.

---

Grata recordatio: Marian Devotion as the Velvet Mask of the Conciliar Revolution

Factual Continuities and Essential Rupture: The Rosary as Cover for a New Religion

At the factual level, this text appears, at first glance, pious and orthodox:

– It praises the Rosary, drawing on Leo XIII.
– It recalls Pius XII and the durability of the Roman See.
– It calls for prayer for peace, for rulers, against war.
– It mentions the incompatibility of certain philosophies with Christianity.
– It urges prayers for the success of the Roman diocesan synod and an “ecumenical council.”

This external continuity is precisely the method by which the conciliar sect launched its operation: preserving vocabulary, gestures, and beloved devotions while subverting their doctrinal foundation and redirecting them to a new ecclesial project. The decisive problem of Grata recordatio is not primarily what is most explicitly pious, but what is silently presupposed and what these pious elements are made to serve.

From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, the text is a soft but programmatic preparatio concilii: Marian language and Rosary devotion instrumentalized to:

– legitimize John XXIII as Roman Pontiff and his succession to Pius XII;
– spiritually anesthetize the faithful before the launching of the “ecumenical council” (Vatican II), which would introduce religious liberty, false ecumenism, collegiality, cult of man, and other doctrines condemned by the Magisterium prior to 1958;
– reduce the fight against modern errors to vague exhortations compatible with liberal-democratic order, instead of applying the precise condemnations of the Syllabus of Errors, Lamentabili sane exitu, Pascendi, and Quas primas;
– substitute the integral, militant doctrine of the Social Kingship of Christ with a horizontal, humanitarian “mutual respect and peace among peoples.”

Thus, the Rosary is praised while its authentic doctrinal content is neutralized and redirected to support the very conciliar process that would dismantle the public reign of Christ.

Linguistic Ambiguity: Piety without Combat, Marianism without Militant Kingship

The rhetoric of Grata recordatio is revealing:

1. Sentimental Marian vocabulary:
– The text is saturated with emotive reminiscences: “sweet memory,” “carissimum,” “amantissima Mater,” etc.
– This affective tone is not evil in itself; but it is carefully detached from precise doctrinal combat against concrete, named errors.
– Where Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII habitually bind Marian devotion to doctrinal precision and condemnation of liberalism, indifferentism, rationalism, socialism, Freemasonry, here we find mainly soft-focus language, generic “laicism” and “materialism,” without operational doctrinal weapons.

2. Generic references to “peace” and “mutual respect”:
– The encyclical elevates “mutuam observantiam,” “fraternitatem populorum,” “solidam pacem” as primary horizons.
– Missing is the categorical reaffirmation that true and lasting peace is possible only under the public reign of Christ the King and the submission of states to the one true Church, as taught in Quas primas of Pius XI, where it is affirmed that only in the Kingdom of Christ is there hope for lasting peace and that the exclusion of Christ and His law from public life destroys social order.
– The language of Grata recordatio is perfectly compatible with the liberal thesis 80 condemned by Pius IX: that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself with progress, liberalism, and modern civilization, understood in a secularizing sense.

3. Modernist strategic vagueness:
– The text speaks of “inconciliability of certain philosophies and practical attitudes with Christian faith,” but without listing them with the doctrinal sharpness of the Syllabus or Lamentabili.
– Such vagueness is a classic modernist tactic: retain orthodox phrases, avoid binding content, leave room for later reinterpretation.
– The pastoral and “serena sed firma” tone masks the refusal to explicitly reaffirm that:
– religious indifferentism,
– the separation of Church and State,
– the autonomy of civil law from divine law,
– the equality of confessions and liberty of cult
are condemned errors (Syllabus, propositions 15–18, 55, 77–79).

This language, apparently devout, functions as a liturgical-psychological preparation for the conciliar revolution: Marian rhetoric as anesthetic for doctrinal disarmament.

False Continuity: The Invocation of Leo XIII and Pius XII against Their Own Teaching

Grata recordatio frequently invokes Leo XIII’s Rosary encyclicals and recalls Pius XII, suggesting a seamless line of continuity: Leo XIII → Pius XII → John XXIII. This is an illusion.

1. Leo XIII:
– Leo XIII’s Marian encyclicals are not sentimental brochures. They:
– affirm the unique truth of the Catholic religion,
– call for Catholic states and laws subject to Christ,
– denounce Freemasonry and naturalism.
– To cite Leo XIII while preparing a council that will promulgate Dignitatis humanae (religious liberty) and Nostra aetate (interreligious relativization) is to exploit his authority against his doctrine.
– This is an example of *verba retinere, sensum evertere* (retain the words, overthrow the meaning).

2. Pius XII:
– Grata recordatio presents Pius XII’s death and John XXIII’s election as a serene passing of the same “sacred inheritance.”
– Yet the coming council would systematically relativize or ignore:
– Mystici Corporis’ doctrine on the Church as the unique Mystical Body of Christ,
– Humani generis’ condemnation of Nouvelle Théologie and dogmatic relativism,
– his clear stance against liturgical experimentalism.
– To use Pius XII as a decorative preface to a project that would dissolve his doctrinal positions is rhetorical fraud.

3. The alleged indefectibility through the person of John XXIII:
– The encyclical insists on the visibility and endurance of the Roman Pontificate while taking for granted that John XXIII, launching Vatican II, is the lawful successor of Peter.
– Integral Catholic theology before 1958 teaches clearly (Bellarmine, Pius IX, Paul IV, canon 188.4 of 1917 Code) that a manifest heretic cannot be head of the Church; if he falls into public heresy, he loses office *ipso facto*.
– When one sees that the council convened under John XXIII and carried on by his line will affirm principles previously anathematized, the supposed continuity is not a datum but the very point under judgment.

Thus, the invocation of Leo XIII and Pius XII in Grata recordatio functions as a rhetorical shield for a real project of rupture.

Supernatural Language Emptied: Silence on the True Nature of the Church and Sacraments

A decisive symptom of this text’s modernist orientation is what it does not say.

1. No explicit reiteration that:
– The Catholic Church is the only ark of salvation (*extra Ecclesiam nulla salus* understood in its perennial sense).
– False religions are objectively offenses against the First Commandment and cannot be granted equal public rights without grave sin, as Pius IX condemns in propositions 15–18, 77–79 of the Syllabus.
– The State must profess the true religion (Quas primas, the constant teaching of the Popes).

Instead:
– The document speaks of “mutual respect” and “fraternity of peoples” in terms susceptible to the naturalistic reading that will dominate the future conciliar sect.
– There is no call to Catholic rulers to submit constitutions and laws to Christ the King; only a mild reminder not to forget “laws that come from God” in generic form.

2. Absence of sacramental clarity:
– The Rosary is promoted as prayer for peace, for rulers, for the council.
– There is almost no militant insistence on:
– state of grace,
– confession of sins,
– abhorrence of heresy,
– necessity of returning nations to the Most Holy Sacrifice and the true Faith.
– Marian devotion is detached from the dogmatic struggle against the enemies of the Church; it becomes a supra-confessional, pacifying ornament compatible with the future ecumenical line.

3. The gravest silence:
– No warning against the internal enemies of the Church, so lucidly denounced by St. Pius X in Pascendi and by previous Popes against modernism and Freemasonry.
– Instead of exposing the “enemies within,” the encyclical prepares collaboration with them through the forthcoming council.

In integral Catholic doctrine, silence where one is obliged to confess the full truth becomes complicity. The omission of explicit, concrete condemnation, especially on the eve of a council, is itself a sign of deviation.

Peace Without the Social Kingship of Christ: A Naturalistic Drift

Grata recordatio calls on leaders not to trust in arms, to promote civil and social good considering eternal destiny. This sounds good, but remains fundamentally inadequate and dangerous in its ambiguity.

1. Pius XI in Quas primas:
– teaches that the root of social disorder is the rejection of Christ’s rights:
– when Christ and His law are removed from public life, the foundations of authority are destroyed;
– states and rulers are bound to publicly honor Christ and shape laws according to His commandments.
– He explicitly condemns laicism and the fiction of religious neutrality.

2. Grata recordatio:
– speaks against “laicism” and “materialism” in general, but does not:
– clearly demand that states officially recognize the Catholic religion as the only true one;
– condemn the thesis of separation of Church and State as such, already identified as error (Syllabus 55);
– denounce the liberal principle of universal religious liberty as morally destructive.
– The call to “mutual respect,” “fraternal union of peoples,” and “solid peace” can be, and later is, easily read as endorsement of the liberal-ecumenical order where Christ’s exclusive rights are bracketed.

This is the core: peace and social good are appealed to in terms that can float free from the obligation that laws, institutions, and nations formally submit to the Kingship of Christ and the rights of His Church. Such abstraction is a step toward the cult of man that the “Church of the New Advent” will solemnize.

Instrumentalizing the Rosary: From Weapon of Christendom to Support of the Conciliar Process

Historically, Popes called the Rosary as:

– a spiritual weapon against heresies, Islam, Freemasonry;
– a bulwark for Christian civilization and Catholic states;
– a school of contemplation of the Incarnation and Redemption in the one true Faith.

Grata recordatio subtly shifts this:

1. The Rosary is ordered toward:
– the memory and praise of John XXIII’s predecessor,
– the affirmation of John XXIII’s own authority,
– prayers for political leaders in terms acceptable to pluralist democracies,
– the success of the Roman diocesan synod and the coming “ecumenical council.”

2. The crucial phrase:
– The faithful are exhorted to pray the Rosary “also for this cause”: that the Roman Synod be fruitful for the city, and “that from the forthcoming Ecumenical Council the universal Church may receive such marvelous increase that even those brothers and sons separated from this Apostolic See may receive from it a salutary invitation and impulse.”

This is programmatic:

– The Rosary is openly yoked to the ecumenical agenda of drawing “separated brethren” not by their abjuration of errors and conversion to the one true Church in the pre-1958 sense, but by a “reflorescence” of virtues in a reconfigured ecclesial body.
– The language points toward the future conciliar ecumenism: less conversion to dogmatic unity, more “invitation” by moral example inside a broadened, relativized ecclesial landscape.

Thus, a central spiritual weapon of Christendom is repurposed to bless the very council that will promote the religious liberty condemned by Pius IX, the collegial and ecumenical ecclesiology foreign to Tradition, and the liturgical destruction culminating in the fabrication of a new rite and a sacrilegious simulation of sacraments.

Absence of Militant Anti-Modernism: A Reversal of St. Pius X

Compare Grata recordatio with Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi of St. Pius X:

– St. Pius X:
– precisely identifies modernist errors:
– evolution of dogma,
– denial of inspiration,
– reduction of Revelation to experience,
– historicism,
– relativism.
– anathematizes them, binds consciences, imposes measures.

– Grata recordatio:
– uses generalities on incompatible philosophies, but:
– no explicit reiteration of the condemnations of Lamentabili or Pascendi;
– no denunciation of those within clerical ranks who propagate these errors;
– no clear call to repress them.
– simultaneously ties the Rosary to the success of a council whose periti and animating ideology are drawn from precisely those modernist currents previously condemned.

This is not accidental moderation but strategic inversion: the anti-modernist Magisterium is effectively bracketed in favor of a “pastoral” orientation. Marian devotion is used as a pious camouflage for the rehabilitation of condemned tendencies.

Symptomatic Reading: Grata recordatio as Early Manifesto of the Conciliar Sect

When read in light of subsequent events (Vatican II, the new ecumenism, the new liturgy, the cult of human dignity detached from Christ, the resulting doctrinal chaos), this text appears as:

– a gentle consecration of John XXIII’s authority in emotional Marian tones;
– a narrative of continuity masking the decision to convoke a council without doctrinal necessity, against the prudence of predecessors;
– a mobilization of the Rosary not as a sword against error but as an instrument to beg blessings on a reorientation of the Church.

Key symptomatic points:

1. Ecclesiology:
– The “ecumenical council” is desired so that “even those separated from this Apostolic See” may receive an invitation, not through doctrinal condemnation of their errors, but through a generalized “reflorescence.”
– This anticipates the later false ecumenism condemned in substance by the pre-1958 magisterium: the idea of convergence without conversion.

2. Political theology:
– The encyclical does not demand confessionally Catholic states as an ideal that remains binding; instead it uses language that is fully integrable into a pluralist order.
– This prepared the betrayal whereby the conciliar sect would accept and promote religious liberty in the liberal sense, directly contradicting Syllabus 77–79.

3. Pastoral style:
– The shift from juridical, dogmatic clarity to emotive pastoral exhortation, without concrete canonical measures against error, is already visible.
– This is not harmless style; it is the method of modernism described by St. Pius X: infiltrate under orthodox language, empty dogma of practical consequences, and then alter the understanding.

Thus, Grata recordatio stands as a polished example of theological camouflage: words that devout Catholics can accept in isolation, arranged to direct their prayers and trust toward the forthcoming revolution.

Christ the King versus “Mutual Respect”: The Non-Negotiable Contrast

Integral Catholic doctrine demands we contrast the horizon of Grata recordatio with that of Quas primas and the Syllabus:

– Quas primas affirms:
– Christ must reign in minds, wills, hearts, families, and explicitly in states and laws;
– rulers must publicly honor Him; omitting Christ in public life leads to social disintegration;
– peace is the fruit of obedience to His law, not of generic dialogue.

– The Syllabus rejects:
– the thesis that man may embrace any religion (15–16),
– that “good hope” is to be held for all outside the Church as if their state sufficed (17 in condemned sense),
– that the State may be religiously neutral (55),
– that all forms of worship may be equally free without moral harm (79).

Grata recordatio, by its omissions and its horizontal tone:

– does not arm the faithful with these principles;
– does not warn against the liberal system in which all cults are equal before the law;
– does not proclaim the obligation of rulers to restore the rights of Christ the King.

Instead, it slides toward a language later fully exploited by the conciliar sect: fraternity, peace, human good, with Christ invoked but not juridically enthroned. This is the theological and spiritual bankruptcy: replacing the concrete Kingship of Christ with a spiritualized, non-binding symbolism suited to the “Church of the New Advent” and its cult of man.

Conclusion: Unmasking the Marian Veneer of the Coming Apostasy

From the perspective of integral Catholic faith:

– The authentic elements in Grata recordatio (Rosary, Marian devotion, mention of supernatural destiny, generic rejection of “laicism” and “materialism”) are parasitized and repurposed.
– The text carefully avoids:
– reiterating, with names and anathemas, the modern errors already condemned;
– calling for the submission of nations to the Catholic Church;
– exposing the internal enemies in the clergy and intellectual world;
– binding the forthcoming “council” to the prior anti-modernist Magisterium in a way that would prevent innovation.

Instead, it:

– canonizes John XXIII’s accession as peaceful continuity;
– diverts Marian prayer to support a project—the “ecumenical council”—which would become the matrix of post-conciliarism, the “conciliar sect,” and the systematic dismantling of Catholic public doctrine;
– trains the faithful to think in terms of “mutual respect,” “fraternity,” and non-conflictual coexistence, laying the affective foundations of religious indifferentism.

The Rosary, in Catholic Tradition, is a weapon. Grata recordatio seeks to blunt its edge and enlist it into the spiritual public-relations campaign of an emerging paramasonic structure soon to enthrone the abomination of desolation in place of the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ. The only adequate response is to reclaim Marian devotion in its integral sense: as a rallying to the Immaculate who crushes heresies, restores the reign of Christ the King, and leads souls out of the illusions of the neo-church to the immutable Faith of all ages.

---

Source:
Grata Recordatio   (vatican.va)
Date: 08.11.2025