Decet Nos is a brief Latin act of John XXIII that suppresses the name “Delegation of Dakar,” renames it “Delegation of West Africa,” and delineates its territorial scope (Senegal, Upper Volta, Ivory Coast, Dahomey, Guinea, Mauritania, Niger, Sudan, Togo, Ghana, Gambia, Sierra Leone) under the Sacred Congregation of Propaganda Fide, invoking the usual formulae of “Apostolic authority” to ensure its canonical effect and nullify contrary acts. This apparently technical rearrangement of diplomatic-ecclesiastical boundaries is in fact a revealing micro-manifesto of the new paramasonic regime: an administrative prelude to the conciliar revolution in which Africa is re-engineered as mission-field and laboratory for a humanist, de-Catholicized “Church of the New Advent.”

---

The African Chessboard of a Counterfeit “Apostolic” Authority

From Apostolic Governance to Technocratic Cartography

At the factual level, the document appears innocuous:

“Decet Nos… ea omnia sollicito praestare studio, quae regimini gregis Dominici… aptius conducere videantur… propter mutatas igitur condiciones Africae… Delegationem Apostolicam, abolito nomine ‘de Dakar’… Africae Occidentalis appellari…”

English: “It befits Us… to carry out with solicitous care all those things which may seem more apt to the governance of the Lord’s flock… therefore, on account of the changed conditions of Africa… the Apostolic Delegation, the name ‘of Dakar’ having been abolished… is to be called that of West Africa…”

Formally:
– It invokes motu proprio, certa scientia ac matura deliberatione (“of Our own accord, with sure knowledge and mature deliberation”).
– It specifies the new jurisdiction.
– It subjects it to Propaganda Fide.
– It closes with the classic absolutist legal formula that any contrary act is irritum et inane (“null and void”).

On the surface: a neutral reconfiguration of an ecclesiastical delegation to match decolonizing states.

Under integral Catholic scrutiny, however, several grave symptoms emerge:

1. The document is entirely horizontal and geopolitical: it reflects new nation-states and diplomatic convenience, without a single word on the integrity of the faith, the Most Holy Sacrifice, or the supernatural end of missions.
2. It is authored by John XXIII, the inaugural usurper of the conciliar line, retrospectively unmasked by his deeds: convocation of Vatican II, promotion of condemned currents, calculated reversal of the anti-modernist discipline of St. Pius X.
3. It uses the venerable language and form of true papal authority to erect administrative scaffolding later used as channels for Modernist indoctrination and liturgical demolition in Africa.

Thus, what looks like harmless cartography is in reality the quiet deployment of spiritual logistics for the conciliar sect.

Linguistic Sterility as a Symptom of Doctrinal Evasion

The rhetoric of Decet Nos is revealing precisely in what it refuses to say.

Key observations:

– The Christological and supernatural motive is evacuated into a bureaucratic vagueness:
– “regimini gregis Dominici… in longinquis regionibus… opera Evangelii praeconum feliciter angescentis” is pious varnish, mechanically applied.
– There is no doctrinal precision about what “Evangelium” is, no affirmation of the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation, no affirmation of the Kingship of Christ over these nations.
– The language is purely canonical-administrative:
– Names, borders, competencies are meticulously listed;
– The salvation of souls (salus animarum), the supreme law of the Church in true doctrine, is not once concretely explicated.
– Africa is treated as a geopolitical object—“regions which are commonly called…”—mirroring the categories of secular decolonization and international law, with no insistence that new states must submit to the reign of Christ and the rights of the Church.

Measured against pre-1958 magisterium, this silence is damning.

Pius XI in Quas Primas unequivocally teaches that:
– Peace and order are impossible unless states publicly recognize and obey Christ the King.
– It is a “plague” to expel Christ and His law from public life.
Decet Nos:
– Adapts ecclesiastical structures to the new laicist states of West Africa without the slightest call to subject their laws, schools, and constitutions to Christ and His Church.
– Speaks as if the Church’s task is to “keep up” with political cartography, not to judge and evangelically subdue it.

This stylistic shift is not accidental; it reveals an ecclesiology inverted: not the world judged by the Church, but the Church rearranged around the world.

Theological Betrayal: Mission Without Dogma, Government Without Faith

The core theological error of this text is not what it explicitly asserts (mere jurisdictional change), but what it structurally presupposes and omits.

1. Omission of the exclusive salvific mission of the Church

No mention that:
– Non-Catholic religions are false and damn souls, as clearly taught by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus (propositions 15–18 condemned).
– Mission is ordered to conversion to the one true Church, not “dialogue,” inculturation, or syncretic coexistence.

Instead, the Delegation is retooled for a soon-to-emerge conciliar praxis:
– Dialoguing with Islam and tribal cults;
– Coexisting with Freemasonic, socialist, or liberal constitutions;
– Accepting religious freedom and indifferentism as “signs of the times.”

When the supreme law of mission—lead all nations into the one fold—is not even named in an act reorganizing the missionary governance of an entire region, we witness the practical abrogation of Tradition.

2. Silence on Christ’s social Kingship

Quas Primas condemns the secularist thesis that the state is neutral regarding Christ; the Syllabus condemns:
– The separation of Church and state (55),
– Religious indifferentism (15–18, 77–80),
– The idea that Catholicism should cease being the state religion (77).

Decet Nos:
– Adjusts ecclesiastical diplomacy to newly independent states whose constitutions are already premised on laicism, socialism, or syncretic “tolerance.”
– Offers no protest, no doctrinal warning, no demand that rulers publicly honor Christ, no assertion of the Church’s rights over education, marriage, or law in these territories.

This is not pastoral prudence; this is acquiescence. It lays canonical channels without doctrinal guardrails, facilitating the slide into precisely those condemned errors.

3. Misuse of papal legal formulas to underwrite a non-papal will

The act piles up classical legal expressions:

“motu proprio, certa scientia ac matura deliberatione… de Apostolicae potestatis plenitudine… statuimus, decernimus… irritum ex nunc et inane…”

These formulas belong properly to a true Supreme Pontiff safeguarding the deposit of faith. In the mouth of one who inaugurated the conciliar catastrophe, they become simulacra: juridical solemnity pressed into the service of a program that will:
– Undermine the traditional Mass through the West African episcopate;
– Promote liturgical experimentation and theological relativism;
– Prepare the later acceptance of religious liberty and ecumenism of Vatican II.

The abuse here is subtle but objective: juridical style is weaponized to create an infrastructure for doctrinal subversion. Lex orandi, lex credendi (“the law of prayer is the law of belief”) has its institutional corollary: lex regiminis, lex credendi — the law of governance shapes belief. Shift the structures away from Christ’s Kingship and exclusive truth, and you reeducate the clergy and faithful.

Conciliar Seeds: West Africa as Laboratory of Syncretic Mission

Symptomatically, Decet Nos must be read as part of a pattern:

– The usurper John XXIII will convoke Vatican II in 1959, explicitly signaling a “pastoral” aggiornamento.
– The very regions listed (e.g., Senegal, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Guinea) become post-1960s showcases for:
– vernacularized, desacralized cult,
– inculturation that blurs the line between the Most Holy Sacrifice and tribal rites,
– religious freedom and interreligious ceremonies with Islam and paganism,
– episcopal conferences that dilute Roman authority and doctrinal clarity.

This document:
– Transfers the missionary governance of these lands into the hands of those soon to be reprogrammed in the conciliar agenda.
– Ensures that the future “bishops” of these states will be consecrated in, formed by, and loyal to the conciliar sect, propagating its counterfeit sacraments and ideology.

The absence of clear, dogmatic mandates is precisely what permits:
– The replacement of conversion with “dialogue”;
– The acceptance of animist and Islamic elements in “liturgical” expression;
– The reduction of the Church’s presence to NGO-like service and political mediation.

Pre-1958 doctrine, especially:
– The Syllabus of Errors,
– Quas Primas,
– the anti-modernist Oath and Pascendi,
makes it clear what true Catholic mission is:
– proclaiming the objective necessity of the Catholic Church,
– condemning error,
– demanding that rulers conform their laws to Christ’s law,
– safeguarding the integrity of worship and doctrine.

Decet Nos is guilty by omission and trajectory: it institutionalizes a mission structure that is doctrinally empty and thus ready to be infested by Modernism.

The Mask of “Regimini Gregis Dominici”: Where Are the Souls?

Integral Catholic faith judges ecclesiastical acts by their orientation to:
– The glory of God,
– The salvation of souls,
– The defense and propagation of the true faith.

Measured by this standard, Decet Nos is strikingly deficient.

1. No doctrinal safeguards

Not one of the following appears:
– Warning against Freemasonry, Socialism, Communism, or anti-clerical forces, despite Pius IX and Leo XIII having repeatedly exposed their plots, including in and against mission territories.
– Reaffirmation of the necessity of integral Catholic catechesis against Protestantism, Islam, animism, and liberalism.
– Exhortation to maintain the traditional liturgy and discipline of the sacraments inviolate.

2. No supernatural horizon

There is:
– No mention of sin, grace, penance, the Cross, the judgment, heaven or hell.
– No call for holiness of clergy or for the defense of the flock against wolves in sheep’s clothing, about whom St. Pius X warns in Lamentabili and Pascendi.

A document reorganizing the entire missionary governance of West Africa can omit all this only if its authors already think in naturalistic terms:
– The Church as an international organization,
– Mission as cultural and social administration,
– “Regimen” as bureaucratic management, not spiritual warfare.

The silence about the supernatural is not neutral; it is the gravest indictment.

Canonical Absolutism in the Service of Apostasy

The final legal section magnifies the perversion:

“Haec edicimus, statuimus, decernentes praesentes Litteras firmas, validas atque efficaces existere ac permanere… irritumque ex nunc et inane fieri, si quidquam secus… attentari contigerit.”

English: “We command, decide, decree that these Letters are to exist and remain firm, valid, and effective… and that anything to the contrary attempted knowingly or unknowingly shall, from now on, be null and void.”

Here we see:

– The usurping authority claims absolute binding force for a measure that:
– lacks explicit doctrinal orientation,
– harmonizes ecclesiastical borders with laicist political units,
– paves the way for conciliar integration.

– The formula that once shielded the Church from secular usurpation is now invoked to shield an internal revolution from Catholic resistance.

Contrasted with Pius IX’s stance, for example in his protests against state encroachments (as cited in the Syllabus’ appended explanations), who declared null those civil laws that violated the divine constitution of the Church, Decet Nos:
– Does not resist impious states;
– But asserts nullity against anyone who might resist this reorganization made to accommodate them.

This inversion is typical of the conciliar sect:
– The language of orthodoxy and canon law remains;
– The substance is reversed; authority is weaponized against Tradition, not for it.

West Africa and the New Ecclesiology of the “People of God”

Though pre-Vatican II in date, Decet Nos anticipates the conciliar ecclesiology that will:

– Democratize and horizontalize the Church into “People of God,”
– Reduce hierarchical structures to service-agencies for pluralistic societies,
– Transform apostolic delegations and nunciatures into diplomatic organs of a religious NGO.

By recasting the Dakar delegation as “West Africa” and aligning it with the emerging political mosaic, the document:

– Makes the Church’s visible presence appear as one administrative actor among others in the decolonization process;
– Silently accepts the principle that ecclesiastical geography must mirror the secular state, not vice versa;
– Foreshadows episcopal conferences and regional bodies that will later justify deviations in doctrine and worship by appealing to “local context.”

All of this is radically opposed to the consistent pre-1958 doctrine:

– The Church is a perfect and sovereign society, not subject to states in defining her internal structures (Syllabus, 19, 39–44).
– Her mission is to judge nations and call them to obedience to Christ, not to camouflage herself within the fluidity of temporal boundaries.

The African faithful are thus delivered into the hands of:
– “bishops” and “priests” formed in Modernist seminaries,
– administering a counterfeit liturgy and sacraments,
– preaching religious liberty, ecumenism, and syncretism.

This is not evangelization. It is the establishment of the conciliar sect’s colonial apparatus.

The Deep Continuity with Condemned Modernism

Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi (St. Pius X) expose the hallmarks of Modernism:
– Evolution of dogma,
– Reduction of Revelation to religious experience,
– Subordination of doctrine to history and “needs of the times,”
– Subjectivist reinterpretation of Scripture and dogma.

Decet Nos, while not doctrinal in form, breathes the same atmosphere:

– “Propter mutatas condiciones Africae” — “because of the changed conditions of Africa” — becomes the decisive criterion.
– Not: because of the eternal Kingship of Christ;
– Not: to more effectively anathematize errors condemned by prior popes;
– But: because the world has changed politically.

This is exactly the Modernist principle: Church structures and expressions adapt primarily to historical conditions. Without overt heresy, the text normalizes the historical consciousness that will soon be weaponized at Vatican II:
– Aggiornamento;
– “Reading the signs of the times”;
– Pastoral over doctrinal.

When authority ceases to speak first from eternal truth and instead from “changed conditions,” the poison is already at work.

Conclusion: An Apparently Harmless Act as a Strategic Node of the Neo-Church

Decet Nos is:
– Short,
– Administrative,
– Externally orthodox in form.

Yet, from the perspective of unchanging Catholic doctrine:

– It exemplifies the new, naturalistic mentality:
– Church as manager of territories instead of guardian of dogma;
– Mission as spatial logistics instead of militant proclamation of the one true Faith.

– It omits everything essential:
– No assertion of the Kingship of Christ;
– No condemnation of the false religions dominating the region;
– No reminder of the exclusive necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation;
– No call to shape emerging states according to divine and ecclesiastical law.

– It manipulates venerable canonical formulae to enforce a polity that will become a transmission belt for:
– the conciliar revolution,
– sacramental invalidity,
– doctrinal relativism,
– syncretic cult and de facto idolatry.

Thus this “minor” apostolic letter is a precise microcosm of the conciliar sect’s method:
– preserve the shell of tradition,
– empty its content,
– reorder structures to serve a coming apostasy.

Where a true Roman Pontiff would have used such an act to strengthen the supernatural mission of the Church against laicism and false worship, here the usurper’s pen discretely aligns the Church’s presence in West Africa with the schema of a world in revolt against Christ the King.

Non licet tibi — it is not lawful: no amount of curial Latin can transubstantiate a project of accommodation into an act of apostolic governance. The African souls entrusted to this new “Delegation” were thereby strategically exposed, not effectively defended, against the tidal wave of post-1958 Modernism that would soon sweep through the entire structure occupying the Vatican and its colonial outposts.

---

Source:
Decet nos, Litterae Apostolicae Delegationi Apostolicae «De Dakar» Novo Titulo « Delegationis Apostolicae Africae Occidentalis » Indito, Novi Eius Fines Constituuntur, d. 3 m. Maii a. 1960   (vatican.va)
Date: 11.11.2025