The Latin text entitled “Fidei Propagandae” (1962.10.01), issued by antipope John XXIII, is presented as a motu proprio elevating the Pontifical Athenaeum Urbanianum to the title and status of “Pontifical Urban University,” framed as a continuation of the work of Propaganda Fide and as an instrument for forming clergy—especially from mission territories—to spread the Gospel worldwide. It praises the Urban College’s history since Urban VIII, stresses academic dignity, legal recognition, and alignment with Pius XI’s Deus scientiarum Dominus, and links this academic promotion explicitly with the imminent Vatican II as a sign of the Church’s universal mission. In reality, this text is a programmatic consolidation of the emerging conciliar sect’s apparatus: it weaponizes missionary language to install a paramasonic, pseudo-academic infrastructure ordered not to the reign of Christ the King, but to the global diffusion of Modernist, naturalistic, and ecumenical ideology.

---

Fidei Propagandae as Foundational Charter of a Conciliar Missionary Oligarchy

From Urban VIII to John XXIII: Hijacking a Genuine Missionary Organ

At the factual level, much of the motu proprio appears innocuous, even traditionally resonant. It recalls the founding of the Collegium Urbanianum by Urban VIII in 1627, underlines its mission to form clergy for pagan and non-Catholic lands, and notes the institutional prerogatives granted to its professors and students.

Key elements (paraphrased and cited verbatim where necessary):

– English paraphrase: “We have long considered that nothing helps more to propagate the faith than to imbue with Christian spirit especially seminarians from regions where the Gospel has not yet penetrated the majority.”
– English paraphrase: “For over three centuries, at Rome, almost under the eyes of the Supreme Pontiffs, the Urban College has existed, forming youth who later rendered great service to the Church.”
– English paraphrase: “The Athenaeum Urbanianum, with its faculties of theology, philosophy, canon law, and ‘missionology,’ already possesses all elements required for university status according to Pius XI’s Deus scientiarum Dominus.”
– It therefore decrees that the Urban Athenaeum “now and in the future is to be called the Pontifical Urban University” and orders this to be entered into its statutes:

“Pontificiam Universitatem Urbanianam esse nuncupandum”

Superficially, this seems a mere organizational upgrade. But read in its own internal logic and historical context—“proxime ineundi Concilii Oecumenici Vaticani II”—it is in fact a structural move: to bind the ancient missionary organ of the Church to the conciliar revolution about to be unleashed.

The decisive, symptomatic datum is the self-presentation of John XXIII as legitimate continuer and interpreter of the missionary mandate—precisely when he prepares the council that will dismantle the Catholic understanding of mission (cf. Dignitatis humanae, Nostra aetate, Ad gentes), replacing the call to conversion with dialogue and religious relativism. The text thus functions as a juridical bridge: from authentic Propaganda Fide to conciliar “missiology,” that is, to the refusal to preach the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.

Linguistic Engineering: Pious Latin as Veil for Institutional Subversion

The rhetoric is revealing. The motu proprio is carefully wrapped in classical ecclesiastical Latin, invoking Scripture and past popes, yet certain emphases betray the underlying project.

1. Cult of institutional prestige:
– The central concern is not the sanctification of souls, but academic and juridical status:
“omnia complectantur quae ad Universitatum dignitatem pertinent” (“they contain everything that pertains to the dignity of Universities”).
– The climax of the text is the conferral of a title and equality of esteem “apud viros doctos cuiusvis gentis” (“among learned men of any nation”).

Instead of emphasizing that *mission* is ordered to snatching souls from error and idolatry into the one true Church, the focus is that the Urbanianum be duly recognized in the global academic guild. This is classic Modernist inversion: authority flows no longer from divine mandate, but from parity with secular and humanistic “universities of the world.”

2. Subtle decentering of supernatural purpose:
– There is mention of “Evangelium salutis,” of “pietas” and “virtus,” but entirely abstractly, without doctrinal precision.
– There is no explicit affirmation that non-Catholic religions are false, that pagans must convert under pain of damnation, that *extra Ecclesiam nulla salus* (outside the Church no salvation) is the foundation of missionary urgency.
– Instead, the text’s energy is expended on statutes, titles, legal parity, and organizational continuity.

This stylized silence is more damning than an explicit error. By carefully avoiding the dogmatic core of the missionary mandate, the motu proprio exemplifies the Modernist method condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane and Pascendi: evacuate content while preserving vocabulary; retain forms, subvert their soul.

3. Signaling alignment with Vatican II:
– The text explicitly aligns the elevation of the Urbanianum with the imminence of Vatican II as if both were harmonious acts of the same “Church”:

“sive proxime ineundi Concilii Oecumenici Vaticani II, quod luce et palam ostendet omnibus Christi Ecclesiam filios ubicumque gentium numerare…”

(“and of the approaching Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, which will show clearly and openly to all that the Church of Christ numbers sons from every nation…”)

This anticipatory glorification of Vatican II as luminous epiphany of universality prefaces what in fact became an institutionalization of condemned propositions: religious liberty, ecumenism, the relativization of the Church’s social kingship. The Urban University is set up as training center for exactly that post-1958 “mission.”

Theological Evisceration of Mission: From Conversion to Globalist Accreditation

Measured against pre-1958 Catholic doctrine, the motu proprio is gravely deficient not so much by explicit contradiction as by systematic omission and redirection.

1. Catholic mission as taught by the perennial Magisterium:

– The Church has always proclaimed that Christ is King of all nations and that states, cultures, and individuals must submit to His law; Pius XI in *Quas primas* teaches that peace, order, and salvation are only possible in the Kingdom of Christ, publicly acknowledged and obeyed.
– Pius IX in the *Syllabus* condemns:
– the notion that man may “in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (prop. 16),
– the equality of religions and the separation of Church and State (props. 55, 77–80).
– St. Pius X and the Holy Office, in Lamentabili sane and Pascendi, condemn Modernist historicism, the evolution of dogma, and the reduction of dogmas and sacraments to evolving expressions of “religious consciousness.”

Authentic missionary formation must:
– teach clearly that non-Catholic religions are false;
– inculcate the urgency of baptism, the state of grace, and submission to the Roman Pontiff (of the true Church) as necessary means to salvation;
– combat liberalism, socialism, Freemasonry, indifferentism, and Modernism as mortal enemies of the faith.

2. What “Fidei Propagandae” does instead:

– It never once articulates the necessity of conversion of infidels, schismatics, or heretics to the one true Church as a condition for salvation.
– It never invokes the condemnation of errors by Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Pius XI, or Pius XII that directly target the liberal, ecumenical mentality already triumphant in the entourage of John XXIII.
– It nowhere warns against the very movements and sects (Masonic, socialist, secularist) that the pre-conciliar Magisterium unmasked as instruments of the “synagogue of Satan.”

Instead, the “missionology” center promoted here—“Pontificium Institutum quod Missionale Scientificum vocant”—is integrated into a framework that will soon redefine mission according to the conciliar sect:
– no longer *“convert and baptize all nations, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded”* (cf. Mt 28:19–20),
– but “dialogue,” “inculturation,” “respect for other religions,” and practical denial of *extra Ecclesiam nulla salus*.

Thus, what is solemnly adorned as promotion of missionary science is, in substance, the recruitment and academic consecration of a new class of ideologues who will teach precisely what the true Church condemned. The text is an instrument for routing the institutional continuity and prestige of Propaganda Fide into the service of the neo-church.

Silence on Salvation, Sacraments, and Judgment: The Gravest Indictment

The most devastating evidence against this motu proprio is what it does not say.

From the perspective of integral Catholic theology:

– Any serious document about missionary formation must:
– proclaim the necessity of supernatural faith in Christ and in the Catholic Church;
– insist on baptism as necessary for salvation;
– call to repentance, renunciation of idols, heresy, and schism;
– emphasize the Four Last Things: death, judgment, heaven, hell;
– ground everything in the Most Holy Sacrifice and the sacramental priesthood.

“Fidei Propagandae” is effectively devoid of:

– any mention of:
– the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as the heart of missionary life;
– the sacrament of penance;
– the state of grace;
– the last ends of man;
– the Kingship of Christ over nations and laws;
– the condemnation of false religions and ideologies.

Instead, the document’s dominant preoccupation is that the Urbanianum:
– “obtain that place of esteem among learned men”;
– be recognized as a “University” according to a modern academic schema.

This is not a neutral omission. In accordance with the method exposed and anathematized by St. Pius X, this silence indicates a shift from supernatural soteriology to naturalistic, institutional self-legitimation. Draining missionary work of its eschatological gravity and replacing it with bureaucratic and academic criteria is not pastoral nuance; it is apostasy in slow motion.

Conciliar Missiology as the Fruit of Systemic Apostasy

This motu proprio must be read as a node in the larger network of conciliar re-engineering:

1. Instrumentalizing pre-conciliar forms:

– The invocation of Urban VIII and continuity with genuine missions is used as *veneer* to authorize an institution that will function under radically altered presuppositions.
– This is the same deceptive strategy whereby the conciliar sect invokes Trent while abolishing its doctrinal force through the “new mass,” ecumenism, and religious freedom.
– The Urban University, once upgraded, becomes an official forge of “missiology” that:
– relativizes the demand for conversion,
– glorifies interreligious dialogue,
– erases the unique salvific necessity of the Catholic Church.

2. The nexus with Vatican II:

– By tying the elevation of the Urbanianum to Vatican II, John XXIII signals that missionary formation must be harmonized with the forthcoming council’s orientation:
– acceptance of religious liberty,
– recognition of “elements of truth and sanctification” in false religions,
– abandonment of confessional states and the social kingship of Christ,
– denigration of the “proselytizing” Church of the past.

Pius IX had already condemned the idea that the Papacy should “come to terms with progress, liberalism, and modern civilization” (Syllabus, prop. 80). Exactly this condemned program is what will be academically weaponized via institutions like the “Pontifical Urban University.”

3. Structural complicity of “conciliar clergy”:

– Those formed in such institutions, after 1962, are by design not guardians of the Apostolic Faith, but propagators of the conciliar sect’s anti-doctrine.
– Their authority is purely sociological and juridical within the neo-church; sacramental validity is gravely doubtful or null where new rites and Modernist intentions prevail.
– Accordingly, their “missions” are not missions of the true Church, but diffusion of a paramasonic, humanitarian religiosity under Catholic symbols—*abominatio desolationis* in sancto loco.

The Primacy of Divine Law over Academic Vanity and Human Rights Ideology

The motu proprio’s obsession with parity among “universities of the whole world” betrays an implicit acceptance of the liberal, secular, and Masonic criteria of legitimacy condemned repeatedly by the pre-1958 Magisterium.

Contrasted with true Catholic principles:

– *Lex divina* and the *regnum Christi* demand that all human institutions—states, schools, universities—submit to the revealed truth of Christ and His Church.
– Pius XI in *Quas primas* makes clear that public life, law, and education must be explicitly conformed to the Kingship of Christ; society cannot pretend neutrality.
– Pius IX in the *Syllabus* rejects the subjection of Church institutions to secular authority and the relativization of Catholic truth among opinions.

“Fidei Propagandae” inverts the axis:

– it seeks for the Urbanianum recognition and rank “apud viros doctos cuiusvis gentis” not by proclaiming the objective superiority of Catholic truth over all errors, but by conforming its structure to the worldly model of “Universities” as codified in a juridical schema.
– It tacitly accepts that authority is accrued by being accepted as an equal among secular and non-Catholic institutions, instead of deriving solely from divine mandate.

This is the mentality of the conciliar sect:
– replace the supernatural note of the Church (*societas perfecta, unica arca salutis*) with a “partner among partners” in academic and diplomatic fora;
– glorify “dialogue,” accreditation, and “human rights” while silencing Christ’s rights over nations.

Delegitimization of the Antipapacy and Its Acts

Given the doctrinal framework drawn from the Fathers, councils, and papal teaching up to 1958, and the principles summarized in the Defense of Sedevacantism:

– A manifest Modernist, who promotes condemned errors or systematically paves the way for their triumph, cannot be head of the Catholic Church.
– As expounded by St. Robert Bellarmine and the classical theologians, a manifest heretic cannot be pope because he ceases to be a member of the Church.
– The conciliar line beginning with John XXIII, architect of Vatican II and its revolution, stands in objective, public opposition to the integral Catholic Faith.

Therefore:

– Acts such as this motu proprio, issued by an antipope, possess no binding authority in the true Church.
– The institutions they “elevate” in the service of conciliar ideology, even if historically rooted in genuine Catholic works, are subjugated to the neo-church’s program and must be regarded with utmost suspicion.
– The very use of missionary and Roman terminology becomes blasphemously parasitic: a pseudo-magisterium attempting to cloak apostasy with the prestige of Propaganda Fide.

Conclusion: From Evangelization to Indoctrination in the Cult of the Conciliar Sect

“Fidei Propagandae” is not a neutral administrative text. It is:

– a deliberate reorientation of a venerable missionary college into a spearhead of the conciliar revolution;
– a paradigmatic example of Modernist strategy: retaining Latin form, institutional continuity, and pious phrases while purging the sharp, supernatural, exclusive claims of the Catholic Faith;
– a juridico-academic cornerstone for training generations of “missionaries” who would cease calling non-Catholics to convert and instead confirm them in their errors under the guise of “dialogue” and “respect.”

The document’s silences—on the necessity of conversion, on the Kingship of Christ, on the dangers of error, on the Four Last Things—constitute an indictment far more severe than any crude heretical formula. It is a polished instrument of deformation, ordered to enthrone the “Church of the New Advent” in the very house once dedicated to *Propaganda Fide*.

Against this, integral Catholic doctrine stands immutable:

– *Unus Dominus, una fides, unum baptisma* (Eph 4:5): One Lord, one faith, one baptism. Not dialogue of many faiths.
– *Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus*: Outside the true Church there is no salvation. Not missionary relativism.
– The social and public reign of Christ the King over nations and institutions, as reaffirmed in *Quas primas* and the *Syllabus*: Not accommodation to liberal, Masonic modernity.

Any institution or document that strategically effaces these principles, no matter how draped in Roman style, unmasks itself as an organ not of the Bride of Christ, but of the occupying structures that seek to replace her.

---

Source:
Fidei propagandae, Litterae Apostolicae Motu propio datae Pontificium Athenaeum Urbanianum Universitatis Studiorum titulo et honore decoratur, d. 1 m. Octobris a. 1962, Ioannes PP. XXIII   (vatican.va)
Date: 11.11.2025